Acronyms are
great. They are a superb aid to speed
reading and a wonderful aid to a lazy sod like me who just wants to dash of a
letter or read a speech just that little bit quicker and who really cares if
people know what the heck I am talking about or not ... I seem really knowledgeable and they’ll get
the gist I’m sure. Or will they?
After all
what we write and speak is often read or heard by non-Rotarians and new
Rotarians not yet versed in how Rotary works and what Rotary does. We are probably trying to get these very
people to join in with what we do but how can they if we are
incomprehensible? Even when no acronyms
are used they have enough on their plate to try and understand the depth of
meaning and detail behind our terminology and programmes anyway without making
it impossible to reach first base.
RYLA is a
great programme but Rotary Youth Leadership Awards at least gives people some
initial idea what is being talked about.
Likewise RLI is a must for all new Rotarians but was that the Redeemers
Leadership Institute? ... oh, you mean
ROTARY Leadership Institute! ... now I sort of get that I might be able to
learn more about Rotary. LETS! Lets
what? SPPETS ... is that a speaker from
the SPCA at our next club meeting?
The reality
in not using acronyms is that it does not slow reading. It only micro-marginally increases the time
it takes to deliver a speech. It does
mean your text and talk make sense to those on the receiving end and their
increased understanding about the topic encourages further enquiry from them
and motivates them to become involved.
Strangely, THAT is why we slaved for hours writing our delivery anyway
and even in casual conversation by studiously avoiding the use of acronyms we
achieve better results, every time.
"BTW" - for the uninitiated LETS is
Leaders Elect Training Seminar otherwise known as a District Assembly and
SPPETS is the New Zealand-based districts South Pacific Presidents Elect
Training Seminar.
It is also acknowledged that many other organisations have the same issues, the difference is we are doing something about improving how we communicate.
It is also acknowledged that many other organisations have the same issues, the difference is we are doing something about improving how we communicate.